Appeal prom Judgment—Dismissal.—An appeal from the judgment taken more than six months after its entry must be dismissed.

Id.—Appeal prom Order Denying New Trial—Review op Evidence.— • Upon appeal from an order denying a new trial the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings may be reviewed.

State Land—Suitableness por Cultivation—Question op Fact.—It is a question of fact whether state land applied for is suitable or unsuitable for cultivation within the meaning of section 3 of article VII of the constitution. If it is “suitable for cultivation,” it can only be sold to actual settlers in quantities not exceeding three hundred and twenty acres to each settler. If “unsuitable for cultivation,” a section may be granted to an applicant, who need not be a settler on the land applied for.

Id.—Meaning op “Suitableness”—Ordinary Farming.—-The words “suitable for cultivation” contained in the constitutional provision have been construed by this court to include “all lands ready ,for occupation, and which by ordinary farm processes are fit for agricultural purposes.”

Id.—Power op Legislature.—The constitution classes lands as suitable or unsuitable for cultivation; and it is not within the power of the legislature to limit the effect of the constitutional provision by prescribing requisites not contained therein.

Id.—Desert Land—Unsuitableness por Cultivation—Possibility op Artesian Wells.—Land in the Colorado and Saltón Desert, which is situated ninety feet below the level of the sea, and which is generally known and designated as “desert land,” which cannot be cultivated in any proper sense of the words “farming processes,” is unsuitable for cultivation; and the possibility of the development of water by boring artesian wells in the future for artificial irrigation does not affect the unsuitableness of the land for cultivation within the meaning of the constitution.