Will—Executor may Appeal prom Order Revoking Probate.—Where a will has been admitted to probate and the executor is duly appointed and has taken up the administration of the estate, he represents all of the beneficiaries of the will. It then becomes his duty to protect their interests, and as such executor he has the right to Oppose a contest of the will until the final decision thereof; consequently, he may maintain an appeal from an adverse judgment in the lower court.

Id.—Executor may Appeal prom Order Refusing Probate.—A person named in a will as executor thereof, who petitions for its probate, is a “party aggrieved” by a decision refusing to admit the will to probate, and may appeal therefrom as provided in section 938 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Id. — Insanity — Insufficient Evidence. — Extreme stinginess, repulsive or filthy personal habits, ill temper, jealousy, a dictatorial and disagreeable disposition, and a propensity to drive hard bargains do not constitute insanity or unsoundness of mind. They have no greater effect than to accentuate the inference of unsoundness founded on other circumstances.

Id.—Manifestations of Senile Deterioration.—Attacks of aphasia and physical disabilities showing a considerable degree of senile deterioration, do not of themselves establish the insanity that is essential to render a person incapable of making contracts or a will.

Id.—Nature of Insanity Necessary to Avoid Will.—The insanity which will avoid a will must be either insanity of such broad charaoter as to establish mental incompeteney generally, or some specific and narrower form, under which the testator is the victim of some hallucination or delusion. In the latter case the will must have been produced in whole or in part by the delusion or hallucination.

Id.—Opinions op Experts as to Insanity—Weight oe Evidence.—The testimony of expert witnesses as to insanity, based on hypothetical questions skillfully framed to call for an answer favorable to the party in whose behalf it is asked,.is evidence the weakest and most unsatisfactory.

Id.—Opinions Insueeicientiy Supported by Facts.—When the opinions as to unsoundness of mind, including those of the intimate acquaintances, are based on facts which show neither morbid delusion nor total mental incapacity, which prove nothing more than personal peculiarities and habits, accompanied by physical weakness, occasional lapses or failure of memory, and defective nervous and muscular co-ordination, and it clearly appears that none of these frailties was present at the time of the execution of the will or affected its provisions in any way, the evidence is wholly insufficient to establish the fact.