Salvatore F. Monaco v. United States of America, James H. Camp v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense

Good Law
523 F.2d 935·1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12733
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 197573-2743, 74-3141aCalifornia1,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

These are companion cases which were consolidated on appeal inasmuch as each presents an identical controlling question of law.

The Monaco case was commenced in the Northern District of California by several civil service employees of the Naval Air Rework Facility at the Naval Air Station, Alameda County, California, as a class action on behalf of themselves and other employees who were in a retired or retainer status from career service in the Armed Forces of the United States. The named defendants are the United States, the Secretary of Defense and a number of other federal military and civil service officials. The action came on for hearing before the District Court on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. On July 3, 1973, the Court denied the motion. This appeal is from the order denying the preliminary injunction and the jurisdiction of this Court is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1).

Similarly, James H. Camp and others filed a complaint in the Southern District of California naming as defendants the Secretary of Defense and several federal officials of the civil service and navy departments. The class of plaintiffs consisted of civil service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.