Mortgage—Interest of Daughter—Gift by Father—Review upon Appeal — Support of Finding — Conflicting Evidence. — Where a father furnished money for an interest in a mortgage, which was taken in the name of his daughter, a finding, upon substantially conflicting evidence, that the money paid and the interest in the mortgage was a gift by the father to the daughter, will not be disturbed upon appeal.

Id. — Parent and Child — Presumption of Gift—Trust not Implied. —In view of the relation of parent and child, the fact that the note and mortgage were taken in the-name of the daughter is prima facie evidence and raises a presumption that her father intended to make her a gift or advancement thereof; and there is no implication of a trust in favor of the parent.

Id. — Custody of Joint Mortgage by Father—Title of Daughter not Affected. — The fact that the father continued to hold the manual custody of the note and mortgage, which were made payable to the daughter and another mortgagee, the interest of each of whom was separately defined in the mortgage, cannot affect the title and right of control vested in the daughter to her portion thereof by the gift, which was perfected when the money representing her interest was loaned by the father to the mortgagor, and the note and mortgage were taken in the name of the daughter, with the intention of the father to make a gift to her of her interest therein.

Id. — Evidence — Repetition of Answered Question. — It was not erroneous to sustain an objection to a question which was a mere repetition of one which had already been asked and answered.

Id.—Deeds to Other Children—Cross-examination. — Where a witness for the father had testified on his direct examination that he drew up the note and mortgage taken in the name of the daughter, and that he had before that drawn up deeds to another daughter, and to a granddaughter, such deeds, and a letter in relation thereto, when identified by the witness upon cross-examination, were properly admitted in evidence.