Final Judgment — Appeal — Action to Avoid Deed — Judgment in Favor op Subsequent Purchasers.—In an action in equity to avoid an administrator’s deed, brought against the administrator and subsequent purchasers from his grantee and mortgagees claiming under them, a default judgment entered" in favor of such subsequent purchasers upon sustaining their demurrer to the complaint, dismissing the action as to them, is a final judgment from which an appeal by the plaintiff will lie.

Id.—Final Judgment Affecting Separate Parties.—Any set of parties whose interests are identical must have the controversy as to them settled before any final judgment may be entered. No given set of parties may try the ease piecemeal, but separate parties, if the court in its discretion so directs, may litigate their controversies separately and may proceed to final judgment without waiting for judgments as to other parties.

Cancellation of Administrator’s Deed—Irregularities in Appointment of Administrator—Lack of Equity.—A complaint by the assignee of the heirs of a deceased person seeking to avoid a deed of the administrator of the estate for alleged irregularities in the legal proceedings resulting in his appointment lacks equity, when it appears therefrom that the appointment was made upon the request of the husband of the deceased, one of her heirs at law, and one of the plaintiff’s assignors.

Id.—Collateral Attack—Informalities in Issuance of Letters.— Such an action is a collateral attack upon the title of those claiming under the administrator’s deed, in which the plaintiff cannot take advantage of mere informalities in the issuance of letters of administration.

Id.—Judgment in Probate Directing Conveyance by Administrator. A judgment directing the conveyance of real property by an administrator acting under the direction of the superior court exercising its probate jurisdiction after letters have been issued to him, cannot be collaterally attacked.

Id.—Fraudulent Administrator’s Deed—Bona Fide Purchasers.—An administrator’s deed, executed in pursuance of an order of the court in probate for the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of the land, notwithstanding it was procured through the fraudulent conduct of the administrator and his immediate grantee, cannot be avoided as against subsequent bona fide purchasers for value, without notice, actual or constructive, of the fraud.

Id.—Notice of Fraud—Insufficient Facts to Put on Inquiry.—The facts that the administrator joined with the vendee under the contract of sale in the petition for the specific performance of the contract, and that .the same attorney acted for both in the matter of the petition, were insufficient to put such subsequent purchasers upon inquiry as to the fraud.