Relley

Relley v. Campbell

Good Law
134 Cal. 175·1901 Cal. LEXIS 739·66 P. 220
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1901Sac. No. 748.California622 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

—This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon mining property. The mortgage, on its face, purports to have been given by Patrick Campbell and the New Blue Point Mining Company, a corporation. In form, the complaint attempts to state two causes of action, — in reality, but one. It contains averments proper in a complaint for foreclosure, with statements tending to show that in fact the corporation is, as to the property involved, but another name for Patrick Campbell, and that he made representations designed to convince plaintiff that the mortgage was regularly executed by the corporation and would bind it, and that in reliance upon these representations, plaintiff accepted the mortgage and loaned the money. And it is contended, that since Campbell was the sole owner of the property and of the corporate stock, he and his corporate double should be estopped to deny the validity of the mortgage. It is also alleged that the property of the corporation had the benefit of the money loaned by plaintiff to Campbell. All this was in anticipation of the objection that the mortgage was so executed as not to bind the corporation.

An action might be sustained upon such a theory, if there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.