Hiett

Hiett v. Inland Finance Corp.

Good Law
1927 Cal. LEXIS 342·202 Cal. 277·259 P. 1102
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1927Docket No. Sac. 4045.California323 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The respondents move the court for an order requiring the clerk of the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of Stanislaus, to file herein a supplementary clerk’s transcript setting forth certain proceedings in the above-entitled action occurring in said court subsequent to the taking of said appeal and the preparation and filing of the transcript on appeal herein, and which proceedings and papers sought to be included in such supplementary transcript have no relation to the questions presented upon said appeal and would hence constitute no proper part of the original transcript thereon. The declared purpose of the respondents in making this motion is that of having such matters made a part of the record upon appeal herein in order that they may thereafter move to dismiss such appeal upon the ground that by virtue of such proceedings to be embodied in such supplementary transcript this appeal has become moot. They have not, however, moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the same has become moot and they may never make such motion. In the event, however, that they should do so they may and properly should support the same by affidavit or other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.