Estate of Spencer

In Re the Estate of Spencer

Good Law
1926 Cal. LEXIS 368·198 Cal. 329·245 P. 176
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 24, 1926Docket No. S.F. 11539.California1,332 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seawell, J.

This appeal was taken from an order made February 2, 1925, by the superior court of the county of Alameda, denying appellant’s motion, as public administrator of the county of Sacramento, for an order dismissing the probate proceedings in the above-entitled matter inaugurated in said county of Alameda, April 20, 1920, wherein letters of administration were regularly issued to respondent by said superior court upon the estate of the decedent, J. M. Spencer, on the thirteenth day of May, 1920. No proceedings for the administration of said estate were pending in any other court of this state. The sole ground of the motion, as stated in the notice, was that said court did not have “jurisdiction of the proceedings.” Said notice of motion constituted the first and only objection made by appellant, or by any other person, to the issuance of letters of administration to respondent and it was not made until the expiration of a period of almost five years following the day upon which said letters were issued.

The jurisdictional defects were not specifically pointed out in the notice of motion, but were attempted to be shown by the evidence taken at the hearing of the motion and were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.