Burke

Savings and Loan Soc. v. Burke

Good Law
151 Cal. 616·1907 Cal. LEXIS 476·91 P. 504
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1907L.A. No. 1643.California1,003 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sloss, J.

This is an action brought to restrain the execution of a tax-deed to the state, following a sale for nonpayment of taxes. A demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff declining to amend, judgment went for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

The complaint in question sets forth these facts: The plaintiff, in 1897, was, and ever since has been, the owner and holder of a mortgage interest in certain lands in Santa Barbara County. The mortgaged lands, consisting of some eighty-eight hundred acres, were included in territory which had prior to 1897 been divided into townships and sections pursuant to the laws of the United States. The owner of the fee was J. W. Calkins, and the land was assessed to him for the year 1897 by sections, as required by sections 3628 and 3650 of the Political Code. The mortgage interest of the plaintiff was, however, assessed in a lump sum, without apportionment or division among the subdivisions or sections composing the mortgaged property. The amount of the tax was likewise computed in the assessment-book in a lump sum, and appears therein as amounting to $1,316.86. No part of the tax having been paid, the property was sold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.