Estate of Pforr

Thornagel v. Pforr

Good Law
144 Cal. 121·1904 Cal. LEXIS 663·77 P. 825
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 13, 1904S.F. No. 3782.California2,285 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The above-named decedent left a last will and testament in which he appointed the respondents Anna Pforr and Max Waizman as his executors, and disposed of his estate as follows:—

The appellant herein is one of the surviving sisters of the deceased and is also one of the beneficiaries under the above third item of his will. The above-named Anna Pforr is the daughter of Christian Pforr, one of the surviving brothers of the deceased. The deceased was unmarried, and left two brothers and two sisters and the children of a deceased sister as his heirs at law. When the will was presented to the superior court its probate was contested by the appellant upon the ground that, except as to the personal property bequeathed to Anna Pforr, it is invalid, in that by its terms the power of alienation of the real estate is suspend ed in contravention of the provisions of section 715 of the Civil Code. The court overruled this objection and admitted the will to probate. From this order the contestant has appealed.

After the expiration of four months from the issuance of letters testamentary the appellant presented to the court her petition for distribution to her of the share of the estate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.