Houssels

Houssels v. Glasgow

Good Law
1934 Cal. LEXIS 601·220 Cal. 757·32 P.2d 609
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 15, 1934Docket No. L.A. 14129.California436 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendants Edwin and Harriett Jones.

The action was brought to quiet the title of the plaintiffs in and to the right to a one per cent of the production under an oil lease executed by the owners of lots 12 and 13 in block A of Mountain Meadows tract in the county of Los Angeles. The plaintiffs sued in their representative capacity as trustees of Atlantic ° Petroleum Syndicate, an unincorporated association.

On July 29, 1922, subject to a twenty per cent owners’ royalty reserved, the owners executed an oil and gas lease covering said lots to Taylor, Hjorth and Looney, who in turn assigned the lease to Gordon, who assigned to C. S. Summar, who assigned to Joseph Maltby as trustee, who, according to the record, agreed to hold twenty per cent of the production from both lots as an overriding royalty in favor of C. S. Summar, N. H. Stearn and others. The issue tendered and tried in this action was the claim of Edwin and Harriett Jones to a one per cent of the production as a portion of the twenty per cent overriding royalty. The court found in accordance with their claim. The evidence showed that as part of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.