Furrey

Furrey v. Lautz

Caution
162 Cal. 397·1912 Cal. LEXIS 551·122 P. 1073
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1912L.A. No. 2635.California1,086 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Angellotti, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, in an action brought by plaintiff to quiet his alleged title to lots 23 and 24 in block 4 of the town of Glendale, Los Angeles County, California.

Plaintiff claimed under certain deeds to him from the state of California based on sales made by the tax-collector of Los Angeles County under authorization from the state controller, the property having been theretofore sold to the state for nonpayment of the state and county taxes for the year 1900, and no redemption thereof having been effected within five years thereafter, deeds therefor having theretofore been executed to the state. If these deeds from the state were effectual to •convey the title to plaintiff Furrey, the purchaser, he was at the time of the institution of this action the absolute owner of the property here involved.

But two points are made for reversal.

The first point is based on the fact that each lot was offered for sale and sold by the state as a whole for a sum largely in excess of the delinquent tax and co'sts, etc., due thereon. It is not claimed that this course was not in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.