Hellman

Hellman v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
147 Cal. 653·1905 Cal. LEXIS 450·82 P. 313
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 1905L.A. No. 1346.California2,009 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover from the city of Los Angeles the sum of $479.60, with interest, on account of taxes paid by him to the city under protest, which taxes he claims were illegal and void. In September, 1900, the council of the city of Los Angeles passed an ordinance fixing the tax levy for municipal purposes for the year 1900-1901. This tax levy embraced the following items:—

Plaintiff was the owner of property in the city of Los Angeles subject to taxation, and paid the taxes for these three items, accompanying his payment with a written protest. The facts being matters of record, there was no dispute over them, and the trial was had substantially to determine the conclusions of law which should be drawn from these facts. The court adjudged the items above set forth to be illegal and void, and rendered its judgment accordingly. The city of Los Angeles appeals.

The city first contends that the complaint does not state a cause of action, in failing to show that the taxes sought to be recovered were paid involuntarily and under protest, contending that the payment was a voluntary payment under 'the authority of Maxwell v. San Luis Obispo, 71 Cal. 466 , [ 12…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.