Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.

Good Law
1932 Cal. LEXIS 353·217 Cal. 124·17 P.2d 709
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1932Docket No. L.A. 12102.California1,997 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from that portion of a judgment adverse to it, rendered in an action brought by plaintiff for damages for breach of a written contract by defendant. The appeal is taken on the judgment-roll alone so that none of the evidence produced before the trial court is before us. Defendant has separately appealed from those portions of the judgment adverse to it. (See Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc. (L. A. No. 12345), post, p. 131 [ 17 Pac. (2d) 712 ].)

The facts giving rise to the controversy between the parties are as follows:

On April 18, 1924, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract by the terms of which defendant agreed that for a period of ten years it would solicit, together with its general laundry business, dry cleaning, dyeing and pressing business, and would turn over to plaintiff exclusively all the dry cleaning, dyeing and pressing business it thus acquired. Defendant agreed that all during the term of the contract it would advertise for and solicit such business in order to secure the maximum thereof. The contract provided that the drivers of defendant should pick up the cleaning, dyeing and pressing work…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.