Cass

Cass v. Rochester

Good Law
174 Cal. 358·1917 Cal. LEXIS 799·163 P. 212
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1917L. A. No. 3829.California1,698 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sloss, J.

On plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings the court below entered judgment in his favor for one thousand five hundred dollars. The defendant appeals.

The complaint was in two counts. The first alleged that on or about October 1, 1912, the defendant received from the Metallurgique Motor Company a certain automobile, “under the terms of a certain contract between said defendant and said Metallurgique Motor Company whereby the said defendant agreed to hold the said property on consignment, and when the said automobile was sold, to forward to the said Metallurgique Motor Company the sum of $1,500.00.” It is further alleged that on April 22, 1913, defendant notified said Metallurgique Motor Company that he would not carry out the terms of the said contract. Thereafter, it is averred, the said Metallurgique Motor Company sold and transferred said automobile to plaintiff. The defendant unlawfully withholds said property from the plaintiff, to his damage in the sum of five hundred dollars, and the value of said property is two thousand dollars. The second count, after restating many of the foregoing matters, alleges that while the automobile was under the control of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.