Sing

Sing v. Barker

Good Law
187 Cal. 587·1921 Cal. LEXIS 394·203 P. 737
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1921S. F. No. 9935.California1,315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

The defendants apply to this court for a writ of supersedeas on two grounds: First, that their appeal is taken from an interlocutory judgment upon which they are not required to give a stay bond, and, second, that the plaintiffs, having appealed from a portion of the judgment, cannot take advantage of the portion in their favor not appealed from, because plaintiffs have by their appeal selected a remedy which is inconsistent with the enforcement of the balance of the judgment, because the portions of the judgment appealed from are inextricably interwoven with the portion from which no appeal is taken.

The plaintiffs’ mortgage upon 970.93 acres of land was subject to a prior trust deed thereof given to secure an indebtedness of $35,000 and certain advances. Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the sale of the land by the trustees for nonpayment of the indebtedness secured by the trust deed, and to have the amount of the indebtedness so secured fixed so that plaintiffs could redeem the property from said trust deed. The trustees claimed the amount of the indebtedness so secured to be $186,000.

By cross-complaint the defendant Grossman, who owned the mortgaged property, sought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.