Bloomer
Heine Piano Co. v. Bloomer
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Lawlor, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, the Heine Piano Company, a corporation, and against the said defendants, G. C. Ringolsky, Frank T. Deasy, James G. Conlan, Robert W. Dennis, and Kohler & Chase, a corporation, in an action brought (1) to vacate the satisfaction of a judgment rendered in favor of the present plaintiff and against defendants Charles and Laura Olson in an action—hereinafter referred to as action 76,831—in the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco, and to revive said judgment; (2) to have said judgment “offset, . . . against the judgment in action 85,133 [in said justice’s court] to the extent that one judg ment equals the other”; and (3) to restrain defendants from issuing execution in action 85,133. Judgment was entered on November 8, 1917, granting the relief prayed and continuing the action for further proceedings as against defendants J. M. Bloomer, Charles and Laura Olson, John Doe, Richard .Roe, Cornelius Coe, and Henry Hoe. Defendants Bloomer, Ringolsky, Deasy, Conlan, Dennis, and Kohler & Chase prosecute this appeal, the record of which is presented under the alternative method.
[1] These last-named…