Higgins

Higgins v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 799·203 Cal. 398·264 P. 744
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1928Docket No. L.A. 9154.California1,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seawell, J.

The above-entitled action was commenced in the superior court in and for the county of Los Angeles by the assignees of a contract to recover damages from the vendor of the property alleged to have been suffered by said assignees by reason of statements negligently made by said owner to said assignees as to the condition of the title of said real property. The facts are stated below:

The second amended complaint, which the trial court held did not state a cause of action, and accordingly entered a judgment of dismissal of the action, from which judgment this appeal was taken, alleged that appellants’ assignor, Charles S. M. Segelbaum, entered into a contract with respondent, Security Trust & Savings Bank, for the purchase of a certain described lot or parcel of real property situate in the county of Los Angeles. One George W. Harkens was the agent of said Segelbaum. That on or about January 30, 1925, Segelbaum assigned said contract and his interest therein to appellants, who paid to said Segelbaum as a consideration therefor the sum of $3,000. That prior to the assignment of said contract and prior to the payment of said sum of $3,000 by appellants, appellants and said George W.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.