Greenebaum

Greenebaum v. Davis

Good Law
131 Cal. 146·1900 Cal. LEXIS 749·63 P. 165
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1900S.F. No. 1530.California1,113 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This appeal is from the judgment upon the judgment-roll.

Defendant John Davis was the owner of an undivided interest in the rancho San Pablo. In January, 1885, one Lynch obtained a judgment against Davis for two thousand one hundred and eighty-tour dollars and four cents, and nineteen dollars costs, and in February of the same year the undivided interest of Davis in said rancho was sold to one Waterman for the sum of two thousand three hundred dollars and forty-two cents, who received a sheriff’s deed therefor. Said undivided interest so sold was, however, subject to a mortgage for the sum of seventeen -thousand nine hundred and sixty dollars and twenty-five cents held by Budolph Hoehkofier, the trustee in bankruptcy, for the creditors of D. Ghirardelli.

At the time said deed was executed to Waterman there was a suit pending in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco-, brought by Joseph Emerie against Juan B. Alvarado et al., the object of which was to partition said rancho; and said Davis, Hochkofler, and Waterman, who were made defendants to said action, stipulated therein that all such lands as might, upon final partition, be allotted to Davis in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.