McNeil

McNeil v. City of South Pasadena

Good Law
166 Cal. 153·1913 Cal. LEXIS 297·135 P. 32
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1913L.A. No. 3392.California1,193 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

By this action plaintiffs sought and obtained an injunction restraining the defendant from improving Huntington drive, a public street of the defendant, the city of South Pasadena. The public highway sought .to be improved consists of two parallel driveways separated by a strip of land eighty feet in width owned by the defendant, Pacific Electric Railway Company as a private right of way for its four-track railway system which leads from the city of Los Angeles to the city of South Pasadena. All of this eighty-foot strip, saving where it crosses intersecting highways of the city of South Pasadena, is owned in fee by the Pacific Electric Company. Over the intersecting streets it holds a franchise for its right of way. In October, 1910, the application of the Pacific Electric Railway Company for a franchise to carry freight over its right of way on Huntington Avenue in the corporate limits of the city of South Pasadena was granted and a contract was entered into between the city and the railway company by which the latter agreed that it would at its own cost and expense pave one-fourth in area of each sida of Huntington drive immediately adjoining its right of way for the entire…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.