Tonini

Tonini v. Ericcsen

Good Law
1933 Cal. LEXIS 454·218 Cal. 39·21 P.2d 565
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 25, 1933Docket No. Sac. 4590.California1,185 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

This action was brought to restrain the defendant Ericcsen from permitting waters from Russ Creek, which defendant Ericcsen had diverted on to his own lands, to escape to and on to the lands occupied by the plaintiff, and for damages already sustained by the plaintiff by reason of water escaping from defendant’s said lands on to the lands in the possession of the plaintiff. Defendant answered and claimed a right, or easement, to have the waters of Russ Creek flow over and across the said lands, of which the plaintiff was in possession. The question of damages was submitted to a jury and resulted in a verdict of $500 in favor of the plaintiff. The equitable issues involved in the action were then tried by the court, and at the conclusion thereof the court made findings, and upon said verdict and findings, gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500, and enjoined said defendant from interfering with the natural flow of Russ Creek in such manner as to cause the waters thereof to escape upon the lands of the plaintiff. In the judgment, plaintiff was awarded his jury fees as costs, but the court denied him any further costs. From that part of said judgment denying him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.