Sato

Ichizo Sato v. Hall

Good Law
191 Cal. 510·1923 Cal. LEXIS 479·217 P. 520
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 26, 1923Sac. No. 3249.California3,342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the superior court refusing to issue a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, the county clerk of Sacramento County, to place petitioner’s name on the register of voters.

On January 21, 1919, petitioner was admitted to citizenship by the United States district court of the territory of Hawaii, and a certificate of citizenship was thereupon issued to him. This certificate recites that he is a member of the yellow race, and that at the time of his admission he was a subject of the emperor of Japan. Petitioner presented his certificate to defendant, and demanded that his name be placed on the register in order to qualify him to vote. The clerk declined to accede to this demand, and pleads as a justification for his action that members of the yellow race are not entitled to naturalization, and that the order admitting petitioner to citizenship is void on its face.

The appellant contends that the order admitting him to citizenship is a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and that this judgment is conclusive as against collateral attack.

This position is untenable. The judgment or certificate shows that the petitioner is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.