Blumenthal

Blumenthal v. Greenberg

Good Law
130 Cal. 384·1900 Cal. LEXIS 847·62 P. 599
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1900S.F. No. 1705.California1,311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This action was brought to recover of defendants a balance of eight hundred and ten dollars alleged to be due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendants at their instance and request for the agreed price of eight hundred and fifty dollars. The case was tried before the court, findings filed, and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of four hundred and five dollars and costs. This appeal is by defendant Greenberg from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. -It is claimed that certain of the findings are not supported by the evidence, and that the court erred in overruling two objections made by appellant to certain questions asked of the plaintiff while on the stand as a witness.

The court found that the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendants goods, wares, and merchandise, and this finding is attacked, and in his specifications counsel says: “There is no evidence whatsoever that plaintiff at any time or place delivered any goods or any merchandise or any wares to defendant, Charles Greenberg.” The evidence shows that the subject of sale was a saloon and the liquors therein, at 313 O’Farrell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.