McIntyre

McIntyre v. Consolidated Water Co.

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 519·205 Cal. 231·270 P. 444
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 1928Docket No. L.A. 10104.California2,110 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Plaintiff Samuel D. McIntyre and some sixty-eight others have joined as plaintiffs to obtain an injunction and declaratory relief concerning certain water rights secured to them by contract. The proceeding is brought under section 1060 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure. That section provides, in substance, that any person interested under a deed, will, or other written instrument, or under a contract, or who desires a declaration of his rights or duties with respect to another, or in respect to, in, over, or upon property,' 1 . . may bring an action . . . for a declaration of his rights, including a determination of any question of construction or validity arising under such instrument or contract. The complaint alleges, in substance, that on the fourteenth day of September, 1887, one Fred J. Smith and William Everett entered into a certain written agreement by the terms of which Smith agreed to sell and deliver to Everett, and Everett agreed to purchase, a stream of water of continuous and uniform flow of six thousand five hundred gallons every twenty-four hours. The water So purchased was to be obtained from a well to be bored by Smith upon lands owned by him and delivered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.