Home Savings Bank v. Los Angeles City Realty Co.

Good Law
176 Cal. 731·1917 Cal. LEXIS 594·171 P. 290
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1917L. A. No. 4065.California886 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sloss, J.

Los Angeles City Realty Company (a corporation) made and delivered its promissory note for five thou sand dollars to C. M. DuVernet, who indorsed it to the plaintiff. The plaintiff having recovered judgment against said Realty Company and DuVernet for the amount of said note, brought this action against J. H. Bullard and others, as stockholders of Los Angeles City Realty Company, to recover the unpaid subscriptions alleged to be due from them on their shares. The complaint alleged that Bullard had subscribed for and was the owner of ninety-five shares, of the par value of one hundred dollars each, for which nothing had been paid to the corporation. Judgment was sought against him and his codefendants for the amounts remaining unpaid on their several subscriptions, not exceeding the amount due on the judgment against the corporation.

The defendants answered, alleging, among other things, that the shares of stock held by them had been paid for in full.

Findings were waived, and judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff against J. H. Bullard and C. M. DuVernet. J. H. Bullard appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only point made in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.