Fossler

Chester R. Pyle Co. v. Fossler

Good Law
1926 Cal. LEXIS 229·200 Cal. 204·252 P. 599
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1926Docket No. L.A. 7551.California2,112 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

—Plaintiff brought an action to foreclose a written contract in the nature of a mortgage for the construction of a building for the defendants and respondents. Prior to the commencement of the action, defendants made an offer in writing to pay plaintiff the sum of $1,000, in addition to the sum of $2,500 theretofore paid, in satisfaction of any and all claims under the contract. The offer, accompanied by a sufficient tender, was refused, and the defendants subsequently paid the money into court. The trial court, by its judgment, decreed that plaintiff take nothing by the action, save and except the sum of $1,000, and that the defendants recover their costs. From this judgment the plaintiff appealed, citing insufficiency of the evidence, lack of proper findings, and errors of law occurring at the trial.

The appellant is a corporation carrying on a general contracting and building business. During the year 1918 the defendants, a mother and four daughters, sold their home in Nebraska and came to California, the mother, Mrs. Kate Fossler, about seventy-five years of age, and ill and weak, and two daughters, planning to live here. They had received $5,000 from the sale of the Nebraska…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.