Frank

Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. Frank

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 822·203 Cal. 483·265 P. 190·57 A.L.R. 696
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 1, 1928Docket No. L.A. 9951.California2,952 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants after the sustaining of general demurrers to the complaint. In the complaint it is alleged that the plaintiff is the owner of a chattel mortgage upon a Stude baker automobile, to recover which the action was brought. This chattel mortgage was given by the defendant Frank to secure the balance due on the purchase price of said automobile. This defendant was not served with process and has not appeared in the action. The automobile was purchased by Frank in the city of Minneapolis, county of Hennepin, state of Minnesota, from the assignor of the plaintiff. The chattel mortgage was executed and filed for record in the state of Minnesota, as provided by the laws of said state. Thereafter, without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff, Frank drove the automobile to California, where he sold it to the other defendants without any actual notice or knowledge on their part of plaintiff’s chattel mortgage. While the mortgage was executed in accordance with the laws of Minnesota, it was not accompanied by the affidavit required in this state by subdivision 1 of section 2957 of the Civil Code. Neither was it recorded in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.