Rehfeld

Rehfeld v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
1933 Cal. LEXIS 461·218 Cal. 83·21 P.2d 419
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 27, 1933Docket No. S.F. 14800.California728 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by defendant City and County of San Francisco, from a judgment of the superior court granting declaratory relief and an injunction. The plaintiffs are owners of a piece of land at the corner of Filbert and Baker Streets, now used as a grocery-store. They sought to enlarge the store by extending it twenty-two feet backward into a lot now vacant. The district in which all this land is situated is zoned for residences. The store of plaintiffs had been erected many years before the zoning ordinance was passed, and by the terms of said ordinance, existing nonconforming uses were' permitted to remain. Plaintiffs filed their application with the city planning commission to rezone the twenty-two feet in the rear of the store, so as to permit the proposed enlargement. The commission denied the request, and plaintiffs then commenced this action. The lower court found that the deepening of the store would not adversely affect the public health, safety, comfort, morals, convenience or welfare, and therefore declared the right of plaintiffs to carry out their plans, and enjoined the defendant city from preventing such action.

It is at once obvious that the plaintiffs and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.