McCartney

McCartney v. Campbell

Good Law
1930 Cal. LEXIS 563·208 Cal. 647·284 P. 220
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 1930Docket No. L.A. 11047.California361 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal. Plaintiff, as the owner of a certain tract of real property in Los Angeles County, having the same under subdivision, sued the various defendants in- an ordinary action to quiet title. Issues upon the complaint and answers thereto and upon cross-complaints by certain defendants and answers thereto were made up as was also the issue made by one complaint in intervention and answer thereto. The defendants constitute a large body of persons, some of them claiming under an agency contract executed by the plaintiff to defendant A. P. Campbell, and others claiming as purchasers from agents of lots in said tract. The action was tried, findings made and judgment entered. Plaintiff appealed.

Respondent Timm moves herein the dismissal of plaintiff’s appeal upon the ground that plaintiff and respondent McCalla have composed their differences by each executing a conveyance of their respective rights in and to said tract to a third party, in which conveyance plaintiff included the lot in said tract to which respondent Timm has laid claim. The argument is that by this conveyance on the part of plaintiff a new contract has arisen which supersedes all the issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.