Fair Oaks Bank v. Johnson

Good Law
1926 Cal. LEXIS 353·198 Cal. 196·244 P. 335
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1926Docket No. Sac. 3523.California2,209 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

This is an action brought to collect the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same. The note and mortgage were executed by the defendant Johnson in favor of the defendant Slocum and assigned by the latter to plaintiff. The complaint is in the usual form of a complaint for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The defendant Johnson answered alleging that the note and mortgage were given in payment of a second-hand Avery tractor purchased by him from the defendant Slocum and that the latter, in order to induce Johnson to purchase said tractor, made certain false and fraudulent representations as to said tractor. Said defendant Johnson also filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff and said defendant Slocum, setting up the same matters as were alleged in his answer and asked for a cancellation of said note and mortgage. The court found that the allegations of defendant Johnson’s answer and cross-complaint were true except in some respects not material on this appeal, and gave judgment in favor of Johnson and against plaintiff and Slocum. Plaintiff and Slocum have appealed.

Appellants’ first contention for a reversal of the judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.