Fuller.

Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.

Good Law
150 Cal. 327·1907 Cal. LEXIS 520·88 P. 978
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 1907L.A. No. 1629.California3,574 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

This is an action to enjoin the defendants from diverting water from the Santa Ana River. Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, as prayed for, was given in the court below. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial;

The plaintiffs own lands through which the Santa -Ana River flows. They have been accustomed for many years to irrigate this land with waters from the river, and for that purpose there is required during the irrigating season a continuous flow of four hundred miner’s inches of water. The defendants, or some of them, own land on the river, situated above the land of the plaintiffs, and upon it they had built a dam in the river and were thereby diverting water from the stream, which, by means of a ditch, they were conducting to other lands owned by them and were there using it for irrigation. The plaintiffs claim, and the court found, that the land which the defendants were thus, irrigating with water from the river was not riparian thereto. The sufficiency of the evidence to support this finding, and the question whether or not the plaintiffs’ land is entitled to riparian rights in the river, are the principal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.