Hooker

Hooker v. Burr

Good Law
137 Cal. 663·1902 Cal. LEXIS 630·70 P. 778
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1902L.A. No. 1026.California3,118 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Plaintiff Hooker was the purchaser at foreclosure sale of land which had been mortgaged by the Spencers. Defendant Rhodes, by assignment, had become the owner of a judgment which one Nicholls had recovered against Anna T. Spencer (in whom the legal title to the mortgaged property stood). Nicholls's judgment was docketed in October, 1897. The mortgaged property was sold upon the 13th of June, 1898. Rhodes, as substituted judgment creditor under the Nicholls judgment, claimed his rights as redemptioner, and, by payment to the sheriff, effected a redemption of the mortgaged property, in due time receiving the sheriff’s deed therefor. Thereafter Hooker commenced this action, making defendants Rhodes and the two sheriffs of Los Angeles County, the one with whom Rhodes’s redemption had been effected, the other by whom the deed had been executed.

The facts are not in serious dispute. The controversies between the parties turn rather upon the legal consequences and effects of their admitted acts and transactions. Plaintiff for relief asked the cancellation of the deed made to Rhodes, that Rhodes be restrained from interfering with, or disposing of, the property, and that the sheriff be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.