Butler v. Union Trust Co.

Good Law
178 Cal. 195·1918 Cal. LEXIS 448·172 P. 601
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 17, 1918L. A. No. 4235. Department Two.California1,202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

The purpose of this action, 'brought by I. J. Grossman, for whom, as plaintiff, C. E. Butler, his guardian, has been substituted, was to dissolve an alleged partnership, secure- an accounting of profits accruing therefrom, and recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the acts of G. A. Williams, now deceased, and for whom, as such defendant, the Union Trust Company, as executor" of his estate, has been substituted, which prevented plaintiff from carrying out the terms of the partnership agreement. Judgment was, rendered for plaintiff, and the court denying defendant’s motion for a new triq.1, he prosecutes this appeal from such order.

As found by the court (reference being had to the original parties to the action), plaintiff was a skilled designer and manufacturing furrier, but without means to purchase material or conduct such business. In February, 1913, he and the defendant entered into an agreement whereby the former was to contribute his labor and skill, and defendant should advance the necessary money for the purchase of material and to pay the expenses of conducting the business of manufacturing fur garments in a shop therefor provided by defendant, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.