Staley

First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Staley

Good Law
1933 Cal. LEXIS 376·219 Cal. 225·25 P.2d 982
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1933Docket No. L.A. 14084.California748 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

In this cause, plaintiff, a personal representative of the mortgagee, by due proceedings" in foreclosure, caused to be sold at a regular sale the premises in dispute and became the purchaser thereof on behalf of his testate on October 29, 1932, and the time for redemption will expire on October 29, 1933. Appellant Nicoll holds the legal title to said property through mesne conveyances from the original mortgagor. She was the sole defendant in the foreclosure proceeding. The property involved is in San Diego and consists of a large lot on which are located some seven or eight tenements which now are and have heretofore been rented to tenants of moderate means. Since the foreclosure and sale a continuous scramble for rents from these tenants has been carried on by plaintiff on the one hand and defendant on the other, the latter being guided and controlled by her attorney, defendant Staley. The present proceedings are the outgrowth of this controversy.

Plaintiff sued for an injunction restraining interference by defendants in its campaign to collect and appropriate said rents. Defendant Nieoll demurred to the complaint on. general grounds. Her demurrer was overruled and, failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.