Stoner

Stoner v. Zucker

Good Law
148 Cal. 516·1906 Cal. LEXIS 329·516 P. 808
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1906L.A. No. 1436.California1,691 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Plaintiff pleaded that defendants had entered upon his land in 1899 tinder license, and had constructed thereon and thereover a ditch for the carrying of water; that he never conveyed or agreed to convey to the defendants any right of way, easement, or interest in the land for the purpose, and their right to construct and maintain the ditch rested wholly upon this license; that in 1900 he served notice upon them that the license to construct and operate the ditch had been revoked and abrogated by him. Notwithstanding this notice of revocation and abrogation, the defendants, disregarding it, have continuously entered upon plaintiff’s land, making repairs upon the ditch and restoring the same where it was broken and washed away, and defendants threaten to continue this trespass upon the lands of the plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore prayed that the defendants be adjudged trespassers and be enjoined from the use of the ditch or from in any manner entering upon the lands of the plaintiff to repair or otherwise maintain it. The evidence established without controversy that defendants constructed the ditch for the purpose of carrying water for irrigation to their own and other lands, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.