Lebrun
Lebrun v. Richards
Opinion
Lead Opinion
This court granted a hearing herein after the decision of the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second Appellate District, Division Two, Burnell, Justice pro tem., writing the opinion, affirming the judgment of the trial court, in order to permit a careful re-examination of the record herein. Upon such examination we are satisfied that said decision is correct as to the law and facts set forth therein, and we therefore hereby adopt the same as the decision of this court, reading as follows:
“There is no dispute as to the facts of this case,• which may be summarized as follows:
“The plaintiffs, respondents here, are the owners of a parcel of land located at the south end of Vancouver avenue, on the westerly side of the street. Vancouver avenue extends in a southerly direction from Whittier1 boulevard, the latter running easterly and westerly. Both streets and all of the territory referred to in the evidence and findings are in Los Angeles county, outside of the boundaries of any incorporated city. Defendant-appellant owns a tract of land east of Vancouver avenue and south of the termination of that street, his property abutting that of the plaintiffs to the east and south…