McDermoth

Bell v. McDermoth

Good Law
1926 Cal. LEXIS 398·198 Cal. 594·246 P. 805
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 18, 1926Docket No. L.A. 8060.California2,077 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This appeal is by the plaintiff from an order of the trial court, made upon motion of the defendant, setting aside its judgment theretofore entered in an action to quiet title and permitting the said defendant to appear and answer in said action. The original complaint was filed on April 5, 1922, and is in the usual form of an action to quiet title. The defendant named in said action was one J. P. Jack, who has since died and of whose estate the present defendant is special administratrix. On July 26, 1922, the judge of the court in which said action was pending made an order for the publication of summons therein, which order was based upon certain affidavits presented by the plaintiff as a basis for his application for said order. Thereafter the said summons was published in accordance with the terms of said order, and thereafter and upon a proper showing of the fact of said publication and mailing conformable to the terms of said order, and after the time had expired for the appearance of said defendant, a decree quieting title was signed and filed by the judge of the trial court. The date of the signing and filing of said decree was December 27, 1922. Said decree, however, was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.