Greenlaw

National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co. v. Greenlaw

Good Law
134 Cal. 673·1901 Cal. LEXIS 845·66 P. 963
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1901Sac. No. 968.California1,047 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Mandamus. Plaintiff is the owner of warrant No. 222, drawn by the trustees of Reclamation District No. 551, on June 5, 1895, for the sum of $3,851.50, upon the defendant, as county treasurer. Said warrant was, on June 7,1895, presented to the defendant for payment, but there being no funds in the county treasury to the credit of said district with which to pay the warrant, the treasurer indorsed thereon the fact and. date of its presentation, the non-payment thereof, and thereupon duly registered said warrant. On April 24,1901, said warrant was again presented for payment, and defendant then offered to pay the same, with interest thereon from the date of first presentation at the rate of five per cent per annum. Plaintiff demanded payment, with interest at seven per cent, and defendant refused to pay interest at that rate, and on plaintiff’s petition setting forth said facts, an alternative writ of mandate was issued and served. Defendant demurred to the petition for want of facts sufficient to constitute any ground for relief, and upon the hearing the demurrer was sustained and judgment entered for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The only question made or discussed is,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.