Newport

Newport v. Hatton

Good Law
1929 Cal. LEXIS 523·207 Cal. 515·279 P. 134
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1929Docket No. Sac. 4047.California1,809 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court in and for the county of Stanislaus, upon the merits, and in favor of the defendants in the action. Alleging themselves to be the owners in remainder of a quarter-section of land in Stanislaus County, subject to a life estate in their mother, the plaintiffs instituted this action to establish their claim, remove an alleged cloud upon their title, and to recover the proceeds derived from sales of the land made by the adverse claimants. In support of their claim of ownership of the land in' remainder, the plaintiffs set forth at length in their complaint certain events which transpired during their minority, and which culminated in a tax sale of the premises and the entry of a fraudulent and collusive judgment in an action entitled Plato v. Newport, and having for its purpose the quieting of the title of the purchaser at the tax sale as against the mother, the life tenant, and the plaintiff remaindermen, these minors. The facts are so fully set out in the opinion of this court in Newport v. Hatton, 195 Cal. 132 -157 [ 231 Pac. 987 ], that they need not be restated here.

The cause was before this court upon a prior appeal from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.