Bancroft

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Bancroft

Good Law
167 Cal. 185·1914 Cal. LEXIS 439·138 P. 742
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 1914L. A. 3214; L. A. 3213California2,395 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Melvin, J.

Appeals have been taken by the defendants and appellants in two eases from the judgments and orders denying motions for new trials. As the two actions are exactly similar they have been consolidated for the purposes of this decision.

The plaintiff corporation, a contractor with the city of San Diego, sued to recover from the defendants an assessment levied for the paving of Fifth Street in said city. General demurrers to the complaints were filed but were overruled. There was no argument on said demurrers. The trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting, as indicated above, in judgments for the plaintiff.

Appellants contend that their demurrers should have been sustained. There was an allegation in each complaint that under the contract with the city, October 17, 1907, was fixed as the time for the completion of the work; that, on September 23, 1907, the common council authorized the superintendent of streets to extend the time within which the work might be completed, sixty days from and after October 17, 1907; that on September 25, 1907, that official “extended the time for the completion of said work for sixty days from and after the 17th day of September, 1907,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.