Central Pacific Railway Co. v. County of Alameda

Good Law
1931 Cal. LEXIS 632·212 Cal. 348·299 P. 75
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 27, 1931Docket No. S.F. 13041.California7,084 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This case was appealed to this court and

thereafter transferred to the District Court of Appeal in and for the First District. It was then assigned to Division One of said District Court of Appeal, and later transferred to this court for the reason that the concurrence of two justices of said District Court of Appeal in a judgment therein could not he obtained. Upon its submission to us we have carefully examined the briefs of counsel filed in the case and the opinions of the several members of the District Court of Appeal prepared by them when the appeal was before that court. After this examination we have arrived at the conclusion that the opinion of Hr. Justice Knight of said District Court of Appeal correctly expresses the views of this court upon the questions presented on this appeal, and we have therefore adopted said opinion, with slight modifications, as the opinion of this court. The opinion as thus approved and adopted by this court is as follows:

“The essential facts appearing in the record are as follows: For approximately seventy years the county of Alameda has maintained a public highway through and along the bottom of the Niles canyon from Niles to Sunol. It was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.