Perry

Perry v. Angelus Hospital Association

Good Law
172 Cal. 311·1916 Cal. LEXIS 532·156 P. 449
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1916L. A. No. 3608. Department One.California1,943 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The plaintiff, May Perry, was employed by the defendant to operate an ironing-machine, commonly called a "mangle," in the laundry of the hospital conducted by the defendant. The action is for personal injuries sustained by her while so engaged. She being a married woman, her husband is made a nominal party plaintiff. There was a trial by jury, a verdict being given for plaintiff for eleven thousand *Page 313 five hundred dollars, for which amount the court entered judgment. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The mangle operated by plaintiff consisted of a large hollow drum or roller heated with steam to a degree sufficiently hot to iron and dry linen and other clothing brought in contact with it by means of two or three smaller rollers rapidly revolving immediately above it. In front of these rollers there was a flat polished board leading up nearly to the point of contact of the upper and lower rollers, upon which board the articles to be ironed were placed. Across the board about six inches from the point of contact of the rollers there was a one-inch iron pipe intended for a guard, but set high enough above the board…

Concurring Opinion

Hearing in Bank denied.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.