Ivett

Merced Bank v. Ivett

Good Law
127 Cal. 134·1899 Cal. LEXIS 612·59 P. 393
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 11, 1899Sac. No. 600.California949 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Merced Bank, a corporation, passed resolutions resolving to go into liquidation. At that time the Bank of British Columbia was its creditor, holding collateral in the form of promissory notes as security for the debt. One Ivett was also a creditor of the Merced Bank to the extent of about twenty thousand dollars. The Bank of British Columbia was threatening to realize upon its collaterals, whereupon the Merced Bank entered into a contract with Ivett by which he was to pay off the claim of this bank, take up these collaterals, and hold them as security for the money advanced, and also as security for his claim of twenty thousand dollars. This contract was carried out. At this time it may be conceded the Merced Bank was insolvent. Some eight months after this transaction the Merced Bank was thrown into liquidation urn der the banking act of this state -by a decree of court, and thereafter it brought this action against this defendant as successor in interest of Ivett, in claim and delivery, to recover the possession of these collaterals, having first paid her the amount theretofore advanced to the Bank of British Columbia. To sustain its claim plaintiff relied upon the- proposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.