Coulter

Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Coulter

Good Law
177 Cal. 574·1918 Cal. LEXIS 644·171 P. 308
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1918S. F. No. 6870.California748 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Angellotti, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action to foreclose a street assessment lien. The claims of respondent in support of the judgment, as shown by his brief, with one exception, are substantially the same as those made by the respondents in Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Bennett et al., ante, p. 560, [ 171 Pac. 304 ], and there being no material difference in the facts, the decision in that case disposes of such claims.

The one exception is as to the matter of an alleged private agreement by the contractor with certain of the property owners liable to be assessed for the work.

The proceeding for the street work here involved, the regrading and paving of the roadway of the crossing of Santa Clara and Twelfth Streets, etc., was initiated October-9, 1911, by the adoption of a resolution of intention, and the contract therefor was awarded to plaintiff February 2, 1912.

The trial court found in regard to this substantially as follows: A private agreement of June 21, 1909, was entered into by plaintiff, with certain owners of lots fronting on East Santa Clara Street, defendant not being a party (it appearing from his answer that he did not acquire his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.