Fetterley

Fetterley v. Randall

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 821·203 Cal. 482·264 P. 1117
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 1928Docket No. L.A. 9158.California288 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action after an order made sustaining a demurrer to the fourth amended complaint without leave to amend.

It appears from said complaint that plaintiff was on the twenty-second day of March, 1922, adjudged insane by the superior court of the county of Los Angeles, and committed to the Southern California State Hospital at Patton, California, and that on December 19, 1923, by the same court said plaintiff was adjudged sane and restored to all his rights as a competent person; that between said two mentioned dates, that is, on August 4, 1923, the defendant procured letters of guardianship to issue to her upon the estate of plaintiff and thereby received control of his property. It is then alleged in said complaint that no notice of defendant’s application to be appointed guardian of plaintiff’s estate was ever served upon plaintiff, and that defendant procured her appointment as such guardian upon a false affidavit, but said complaint fails to show the contents of such affidavit, or the particulars in which it was false. A further allegation of said complaint sets forth that defendant had presented her final account as such guardian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.