Becker

Becker v. Schmidlin

Good Law
153 Cal. 669·1908 Cal. LEXIS 511·96 P. 280
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 28, 1908S.F. No. 4705.California1,479 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lorigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order dismissing an action. The suit was brought to recover damages for slander, the complaint setting forth several causes ■of action, and it being alleged that the slanderous words were uttered by defendant, of and concerning the plaintiff at various dates between the first day of December, 1904, and the first day of February, 1905. The complaint was filed October 16, 1905, and was accompanied by an undertaking in the sum of five hundred dollars, filed on the same day, in favor of defendant as provided by statute. (Stats. 1871, sec. 1, p. 533.)

Upon January 26, 1906, upon notice of defendant excepting to the sureties on the undertaking filed and objecting to the undertaking itself and the manner of its execution and requiring that the sureties justify, that matter came up for disposition before the department of the superior court in which the action was pending. At the hearing counsel for defendant waived objection to the sufficiency of the sureties themselves, but objected that they had never executed any undertaking in the action. From the showing-made it appeared that the undertaking in question had been executed by the sureties on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.