Newhall

Newhall v. Western Zinc Min. Co.

Good Law
164 Cal. 380·1912 Cal. LEXIS 356·128 P. 1040
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1912S.F. No. 5896.California1,106 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

On the fourth day of March, 1909, plaintiff, as assignee of certain claims for goods sold and delivered to the Western Zinc Mining Company, a corporation, commenced his action against this corporation upon these claims. The complaint was verified and contained the usual and appropriate averment of the corporate existence and capacity of the defendant. On the twenty-fourth day of March, 1909, what purported to be the answer of the corporation ivas filed. This answer was verified by obe P. A. Brangier, declaring himself to be a director of the defendant. The answer admitted, by failing to deny, the averment in the complaint touching the corporate capacity of the defendant. Subsequently the action was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and on the eighth day of April, 1910, the court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $24,193.80. On the twenty-sixth day of September, 1910, I. W. Levy entered his appearance in the action and gave notice of his intended motion to set the judgment aside. The motion was made and was by the court denied. In support of the motion it is established by affidavit of the moving party that he was during all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.