Wilbur

Wilbur v. Wilbur

Good Law
1925 Cal. LEXIS 209·197 Cal. 1·239 P. 332
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1925Docket No. Sac. 3600.California5,859 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seawell, J.

Mrs. Hazel Wilbur, wife of codefendant Glen A. Wilbur, who was made a party to the suit, appeared and filed her answer in which she disclaimed all right, title, estate, and interest in and to the lands, premises, and personal property or thing involved in the action.

Plaintiff and appellant, Elmira J. Wilbur, is the mother of Glen A. Wilbur, defendant and respondent herein. The real property, the transfer of which it is claimed by the appellant was fraudulently made, as will later appear, and which is the basis of the action, was a part of a larger estate originally acquired by A. H. Wilbur, husband of appellant and father of respondent, deceased since 1898. Besides respondent Glen A. Wilbur there are three other children, issue of said A. H. Wilbur, since deceased, and his said wife, Elmira J. Wilbur, plaintiff and appellant, to wit, Edith Mary Wilbur, Lloyd H. Wilbur, and Elaine May Wilbur. Glen A. Wilbur is the youngest member of the family. The estate or lands in question are situate in Sutter County, some four or five miles northerly from Tuba City. In 1858, that being also the year that A. H. Wilbur and appellant were married, the husband purchased the lands involved in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.