Cockerill

Cockerill v. State Bar

Good Law
1931 Cal. LEXIS 643·212 Cal. 439·298 P. 807
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 30, 1931Docket No. L.A. 12664.California248 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Petition for admission to practice law. The petitioner, having been duly admitted to practice before all the courts of the state of Washington and of' the state of Idaho, filed his application for admission to practice in the courts of the state of California, but his application was denied by the Committee of Bar Examiners of The State Bar “on the ground that he has not been engaged in the actual practice of law in any sister state or foreign countries where the common law of England constitutes the basis of jurisdiction for a period of at least three years within the period of seven years immediately preceding the filing of his application in this state on or about December 6, 1929, but that he is in all other respects qualified for admission to practice law in California”.

We have examined the record of the petitioner’s activities in the legal profession, as presented by the Board of Bar Governors, and are of the view that the petitioner comes sufficiently within the requirement of section 279 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and within the letter an'd spirit of the State Bar Act relating to admissions, to entitle him to favorable action upon his petition.

It is therefore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.