Foristiere

Foristiere v. Aetna Ins. Co.

Good Law
1930 Cal. LEXIS 452·209 Cal. 92·285 P. 849
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1930Docket No. S.F. 13176.California1,586 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

Action in assumpsit on a policy of insurance for a loss by fire. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Two causes are presented on one record. Both policies are of the standard form. The facts in each case are identical except as to the name of the defendant and the amount of insurance, together with an immaterial difference as to the date of the beginning of the period of insurance. We shall, therefore, deal with the facts of but one cause.

One Catania owned four adjoining city lots in Fresno upon which was situated an olive oil factory with fixed and movable machinery therein. Certain buildings thereon were also used for mercantile and residence purposes. Two of the lots were mortgaged to the Bank of Italy. On August 6, 1924, foreclosure proceedings were instituted. On October 22, 1925, judgment in foreclosure was entered and a sale of the property ordered. On November 18, 1925, the bank purchased the property at the sheriff’s sale. Prior to sale on November 6, 1925, defendant issued to Catania, as owner, its policy of insurance, not to exceed five thousand dollars, against loss by fire, upon said buildings, said machinery and said merchandise, the term to be one year from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.